517 2004-10-04 00:10:21 +0000 interitance redefinition fails to compile 2005-10-03 22:47:35 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified JacORB IDL compiler 2.2 PC Windows 2000 RESOLVED FIXED P2 major --- 1 gordon sm lxhjw2000 Thomas.Leineweber zhijiedong oldest_to_newest 1152 0 gordon 2004-10-04 00:10:21 +0000 We use interitance quite heavily in our app and inevitably we will reuse the same class variable names. But redefinition is allowed with inheritance in IDL. Under jacorb 1.4 this worked fine. Under 2.2 it is failing to compile. Sample code: interface A { const string NAME = "interface_A"; }; interface B : A { const string NAME = "interface_B"; }; This code above compiles under 1.4 and TAO but fails under 2.2 with message: java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not find definition of : B.NAME at org.jacorb.idl.TypeMap.removeDefinition(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.NameTable.define(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.ConstDecl.parse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.InterfaceBody.internal_parse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.InterfaceBody.parse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.Interface.parse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.Definition.parse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.Spec.parse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.CUP$actions.CUP$do_action(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.parser.do_action(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.runtime.lr_parser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.parser.prepareAndParse(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.parser.compile(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.parser.compile(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.parser.compileAndHandle(Unknown Source) at org.jacorb.idl.parser.main(Unknown Source) [jacorb.idl] ERROR : C:\Projects\test_jacorb.idl, line: 9(1): Exception: java.la ng.RuntimeException: Could not find definition of : B.NAME 1153 1 sm 2004-10-04 10:35:51 +0000 This is quite correct as per the CORBA spec. Redefinition is *not* allowed. You need to change your IDL so it conforms. See bug 479 for more. 1154 2 sm 2004-10-04 10:36:27 +0000 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 479 *** 1156 3 sm 2004-10-04 15:07:55 +0000 Sorry - my mistake. I didn't read that properly. I thought they were attributes rather than consts. Not a duplicate at all. 1477 4 sm 2005-07-15 12:25:13 +0000 *** Bug 613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 1516 5 sm 2005-08-15 17:22:25 +0000 *** Bug 624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 1539 6 180 Thomas.Leineweber 2005-08-23 15:26:10 +0000 Created attachment 180 proposed patch. Gives correct result for given testcase 1540 7 Thomas.Leineweber 2005-08-24 12:05:16 +0000 this bug seems to be the same as bug #616. The patch given there resolves the problem in this bug, too. 1565 8 spiegel 2005-10-03 22:47:35 +0000 Should be solved now by the patch for bug 616, which I just installed. 180 2005-08-23 15:26:10 +0000 2005-08-23 15:26:10 +0000 proposed patch. Gives correct result for given testcase bug517.diff text/plain 600 Thomas.Leineweber LS0tIC9ob21lL2xlaW5ld2ViL3dvcmsvamFjb3JiL0phY09SQi0yLjIuMi9zcmMvb3JnL2phY29y Yi9pZGwvTmFtZVRhYmxlLmphdmEJTW9uIE1hciAyOCAyMTo1ODozMCAyMDA1CisrKyAuL05hbWVU YWJsZS5qYXZhCVR1ZSBBdWcgMjMgMTU6MjM6NDEgMjAwNQpAQCAtMTc0LDcgKzE3NCw5IEBACiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLy8gcmVtb3ZlIHRoZSBpbmhlcml0ZWQgdHlwZSBkZWZpbml0aW9uLCBh IG5ldyBvbmUgd2lsbCBiZQ0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAvLyBhZGRlZCBzb29uIHVuZGVyIHRo aXMgbmFtZSEgQWRkaXRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBsaW5lIGZpeGVzDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC8v IGJ1ZyAjMzQ1DQotICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFR5cGVNYXAucmVtb3ZlRGVmaW5pdGlvbiggbmFt ZSApOw0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAvLyBhZGRpdGlvbmFsbHksIGNoZWNrIGZvciBhIHJlZGVm aW5lZCBjb25zdGFudCAoYnVnIDUxNykNCisJCWlmICgha2luZC5lcXVhbHMoImNvbnN0YW50Iikp DQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgVHlwZU1hcC5yZW1vdmVEZWZpbml0aW9uKCBuYW1lICk7DQog ICAgICAgICAgICAgfQ0KICAgICAgICAgfQ0KIA0K